Cuba vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary
Cuba
32.3%
in 2010
Latvia
34.7%
in 2010
Cuba rank
15th
Latvia rank
12th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 34.7% against 32.3% in Cuba, a difference of 2.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Cuba's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Cuba ranks 15th and Latvia ranks 12th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 4.7% | 10.5% | 5.8% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 9.6% | 14.3% | 4.7% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 17.7% | 19.5% | 1.8% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 25.9% | 27.5% | 1.7% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 31.5% | 36.7% | 5.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 32.3% | 34.7% | 2.3% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary, Cuba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 34.7% against 32.3% in Cuba as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary between Cuba and Latvia?
- 2.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Cuba ranks 15th and Latvia ranks 12th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.