Latvia vs Uruguay: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary
Latvia
5.2%
in 2010
Uruguay
5.7%
in 2010
Latvia rank
52nd
Uruguay rank
49th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Uruguay
How they compare
Uruguay currently reports 5.7% against 5.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Uruguay's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 8 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Uruguay ahead.
Latvia ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 49th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 2 and Uruguay in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Uruguay | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.6% | 3.4% | 1.8% | Uruguay |
| 1970s | 3.4% | 3.6% | 0.2% | Uruguay |
| 1980s | 4.6% | 4.3% | 0.3% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.6% | 5.5% | 0.0% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.0% | 6.0% | 0.0% | — |
| 2010s | 5.2% | 5.7% | 0.5% | Uruguay |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary, Latvia or Uruguay?
- Uruguay, at 5.7% against 5.2% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary between Latvia and Uruguay?
- 0.5%, with Uruguay ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Uruguay?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Uruguay rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 52nd and Uruguay ranks 49th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.