Congo vs Libya: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary
Congo
1.5%
in 2010
Libya
1.7%
in 2010
Congo rank
100th
Libya rank
99th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary over time
- Congo
- Libya
How they compare
Libya currently reports 1.7% against 1.5% in Congo, a difference of 0.2%.
That makes Libya's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Libya ahead.
Congo ranks 100th and Libya ranks 99th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 3 and Libya in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.0% | Congo |
| 1970s | 0.2% | 0.2% | 0.0% | — |
| 1980s | 0.7% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Libya |
| 1990s | 2.4% | 1.3% | 1.1% | Congo |
| 2000s | 2.9% | 0.9% | 1.9% | Congo |
| 2010s | 1.5% | 1.7% | 0.2% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary, Congo or Libya?
- Libya, at 1.7% against 1.5% in Congo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary between Congo and Libya?
- 0.2%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Libya?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Libya rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary?
- Congo ranks 100th and Libya ranks 99th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 40-44 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.