New Zealand vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary
New Zealand
21.0%
in 2010
Philippines
16.8%
in 2010
New Zealand rank
5th
Philippines rank
8th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- New Zealand
- Philippines
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 21.0% against 16.8% in Philippines, a difference of 4.2%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.3 times Philippines's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
New Zealand ranks 5th and Philippines ranks 8th of 144 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | New Zealand | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.1% | 2.1% | 1.0% | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 9.6% | 3.1% | 6.5% | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 18.5% | 6.6% | 11.9% | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 22.5% | 11.3% | 11.3% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 20.9% | 17.0% | 3.9% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 21.0% | 16.8% | 4.3% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary, New Zealand or Philippines?
- New Zealand, at 21.0% against 16.8% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary between New Zealand and Philippines?
- 4.2%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for New Zealand and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do New Zealand and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- New Zealand ranks 5th and Philippines ranks 8th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.