Latvia vs Sri Lanka: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary
Latvia
4.8%
in 2010
Sri Lanka
4.9%
in 2010
Latvia rank
64th
Sri Lanka rank
62nd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Sri Lanka
How they compare
Sri Lanka currently reports 4.9% against 4.8% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Sri Lanka in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Sri Lanka | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.5% | 0.2% | 2.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 4.1% | 0.7% | 3.4% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 5.2% | 0.7% | 4.5% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.6% | 2.3% | 3.2% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 5.5% | 5.0% | 0.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4.8% | 4.9% | 0.1% | Sri Lanka |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary, Latvia or Sri Lanka?
- Sri Lanka, at 4.9% against 4.8% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary between Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 0.1%, with Sri Lanka ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Sri Lanka?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Sri Lanka rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 64th and Sri Lanka ranks 62nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.