Latvia vs Romania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary
Latvia
4.8%
in 2010
Romania
4.1%
in 2010
Latvia rank
64th
Romania rank
66th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 4.8% against 4.1% in Romania, a difference of 0.7%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Romania's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 64th and Romania ranks 66th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.5% | 1.0% | 1.5% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 4.1% | 1.6% | 2.5% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 5.2% | 2.8% | 2.4% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.6% | 3.0% | 2.6% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 5.5% | 3.3% | 2.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 4.8% | 4.1% | 0.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary, Latvia or Romania?
- Latvia, at 4.8% against 4.1% in Romania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary between Latvia and Romania?
- 0.7%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 64th and Romania ranks 66th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.