Australia vs Chile: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary
Australia
13.2%
in 2010
Chile
12.4%
in 2010
Australia rank
15th
Chile rank
18th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Chile
How they compare
Australia currently reports 13.2% against 12.4% in Chile, a difference of 0.8%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 15th and Chile ranks 18th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Chile in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Chile | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 7.1% | 0.4% | 6.7% | Australia |
| 1970s | 7.7% | 1.5% | 6.2% | Australia |
| 1980s | 8.8% | 5.5% | 3.3% | Australia |
| 1990s | 11.4% | 6.8% | 4.5% | Australia |
| 2000s | 10.3% | 14.1% | 3.8% | Chile |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 12.4% | 0.9% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary, Australia or Chile?
- Australia, at 13.2% against 12.4% in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary between Australia and Chile?
- 0.8%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Chile?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Chile rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 15th and Chile ranks 18th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.