Libya vs Togo: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary
Libya
22.4%
in 2010
Togo
21.9%
in 2010
Libya rank
32nd
Togo rank
34th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Libya
- Togo
How they compare
Libya currently reports 22.4% against 21.9% in Togo, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Togo ahead.
Libya ranks 32nd and Togo ranks 34th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 2 and Togo in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Togo | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.3% | 0.4% | 0.1% | Togo |
| 1970s | 1.9% | 1.8% | 0.1% | Libya |
| 1980s | 5.7% | 8.9% | 3.2% | Togo |
| 1990s | 10.6% | 16.1% | 5.5% | Togo |
| 2000s | 17.4% | 18.5% | 1.1% | Togo |
| 2010s | 22.4% | 21.9% | 0.4% | Libya |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary, Libya or Togo?
- Libya, at 22.4% against 21.9% in Togo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary between Libya and Togo?
- 0.5%, with Libya ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Togo?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Togo rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 32nd and Togo ranks 34th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.