Latvia vs Tonga: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary
Latvia
35.6%
in 2010
Tonga
31.6%
in 2010
Latvia rank
13th
Tonga rank
16th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Tonga
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 35.6% against 31.6% in Tonga, a difference of 4.0%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Tonga's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tonga ahead.
Latvia ranks 13th and Tonga ranks 16th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.7% | 37.4% | 22.7% | Tonga |
| 1970s | 21.0% | 37.3% | 16.3% | Tonga |
| 1980s | 27.4% | 36.6% | 9.3% | Tonga |
| 1990s | 33.0% | 58.8% | 25.8% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 37.3% | 55.8% | 18.5% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 35.6% | 31.6% | 4.0% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary, Latvia or Tonga?
- Latvia, at 35.6% against 31.6% in Tonga as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary between Latvia and Tonga?
- 4.0%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Tonga rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 13th and Tonga ranks 16th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.