Ghana vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary
Ghana
37.3%
in 2010
Latvia
35.6%
in 2010
Ghana rank
11th
Latvia rank
13th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 37.3% against 35.6% in Latvia, a difference of 1.7%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Ghana ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 13th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.5% | 14.7% | 11.2% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 15.8% | 21.0% | 5.2% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 24.9% | 27.4% | 2.5% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 36.7% | 33.0% | 3.7% | Ghana |
| 2000s | 36.8% | 37.3% | 0.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 37.3% | 35.6% | 1.7% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary, Ghana or Latvia?
- Ghana, at 37.3% against 35.6% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary between Ghana and Latvia?
- 1.7%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Ghana ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 13th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.