Cuba vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary
Cuba
35.0%
in 2010
Latvia
35.6%
in 2010
Cuba rank
15th
Latvia rank
13th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 35.6% against 35.0% in Cuba, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Cuba ranks 15th and Latvia ranks 13th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.3% | 14.7% | 9.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 12.3% | 21.0% | 8.7% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 23.4% | 27.4% | 3.9% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 29.4% | 33.0% | 3.6% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 32.8% | 37.3% | 4.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 35.0% | 35.6% | 0.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary, Cuba or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 35.6% against 35.0% in Cuba as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary between Cuba and Latvia?
- 0.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary?
- Cuba ranks 15th and Latvia ranks 13th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 35-39 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.