Ghana vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary
Ghana
35.3%
in 2010
Latvia
35.2%
in 2010
Ghana rank
12th
Latvia rank
14th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary over time
- Ghana
- Latvia
How they compare
Ghana currently reports 35.3% against 35.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Ghana ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 14th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Ghana averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ghana | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.5% | 16.8% | 13.3% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 19.9% | 24.1% | 4.2% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 32.9% | 30.2% | 2.7% | Ghana |
| 1990s | 39.5% | 34.3% | 5.1% | Ghana |
| 2000s | 34.5% | 35.5% | 0.9% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 35.3% | 35.2% | 0.1% | Ghana |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary, Ghana or Latvia?
- Ghana, at 35.3% against 35.2% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary between Ghana and Latvia?
- 0.1%, with Ghana ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ghana and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ghana and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary?
- Ghana ranks 12th and Latvia ranks 14th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.