Cuba vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary
Cuba
39.1%
in 2010
Latvia
35.2%
in 2010
Cuba rank
11th
Latvia rank
14th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary over time
- Cuba
- Latvia
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 39.1% against 35.2% in Latvia, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Cuba's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Cuba ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 14th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 1 and Latvia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.3% | 16.8% | 11.5% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 14.4% | 24.1% | 9.7% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 26.1% | 30.2% | 4.1% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 32.3% | 34.3% | 2.1% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 34.1% | 35.5% | 1.3% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 39.1% | 35.2% | 3.9% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary, Cuba or Latvia?
- Cuba, at 39.1% against 35.2% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary between Cuba and Latvia?
- 3.9%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Cuba and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary?
- Cuba ranks 11th and Latvia ranks 14th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.