Congo vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary
Congo
35.2%
in 2010
Latvia
35.2%
in 2010
Congo rank
13th
Latvia rank
14th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary over time
- Congo
- Latvia
How they compare
Congo currently reports 35.2% against 35.2% in Latvia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Congo ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 14th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Congo averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.9% | 16.8% | 14.9% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 6.2% | 24.1% | 17.9% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 16.1% | 30.2% | 14.1% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 33.6% | 34.3% | 0.8% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 44.9% | 35.5% | 9.5% | Congo |
| 2010s | 35.2% | 35.2% | 0.0% | Congo |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary, Congo or Latvia?
- Congo, at 35.2% against 35.2% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary between Congo and Latvia?
- 0.0%, with Congo ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary?
- Congo ranks 13th and Latvia ranks 14th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.