Chile vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary
Chile
20.2%
in 2010
Philippines
21.5%
in 2010
Chile rank
33rd
Philippines rank
31st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary over time
- Chile
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 21.5% against 20.2% in Chile, a difference of 1.3%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 31st of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 4 and Philippines in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 12.1% | 4.8% | 7.2% | Chile |
| 1970s | 15.5% | 8.2% | 7.3% | Chile |
| 1980s | 15.6% | 11.9% | 3.7% | Chile |
| 1990s | 14.2% | 12.9% | 1.3% | Chile |
| 2000s | 15.7% | 15.9% | 0.2% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 20.2% | 21.5% | 1.3% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary, Chile or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 21.5% against 20.2% in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary between Chile and Philippines?
- 1.3%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary?
- Chile ranks 33rd and Philippines ranks 31st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 30-34 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.