Latvia vs Tonga: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary
Latvia
23.3%
in 2010
Tonga
23.9%
in 2010
Latvia rank
31st
Tonga rank
28th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 23.9% against 23.3% in Latvia, a difference of 0.6%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Tonga has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 31st and Tonga ranks 28th of 144 countries.
Tonga has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.6% | 37.3% | 16.7% | Tonga |
| 1970s | 27.9% | 36.6% | 8.8% | Tonga |
| 1980s | 32.6% | 59.7% | 27.1% | Tonga |
| 1990s | 35.0% | 59.2% | 24.2% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 35.5% | 60.8% | 25.4% | Tonga |
| 2010s | 23.3% | 23.9% | 0.6% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary, Latvia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 23.9% against 23.3% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary between Latvia and Tonga?
- 0.6%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Tonga rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 31st and Tonga ranks 28th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.