Latvia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary
Latvia
23.3%
in 2010
Philippines
22.9%
in 2010
Latvia rank
31st
Philippines rank
34th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Philippines
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 23.3% against 22.9% in Philippines, a difference of 0.4%.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Latvia has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 31st and Philippines ranks 34th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 20.6% | 6.2% | 14.4% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 27.9% | 8.6% | 19.3% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 32.6% | 13.2% | 19.4% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 35.0% | 16.1% | 18.9% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 35.5% | 17.1% | 18.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 23.3% | 22.9% | 0.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary, Latvia or Philippines?
- Latvia, at 23.3% against 22.9% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary between Latvia and Philippines?
- 0.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 31st and Philippines ranks 34th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 25-29 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.