Latvia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 20-24 with tertiary
Latvia
30.0%
in 2010
Philippines
27.4%
in 2010
Latvia rank
8th
Philippines rank
11th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 20-24 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Philippines
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 30.0% against 27.4% in Philippines, a difference of 2.6%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 11th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.8% | 4.8% | 4.0% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 10.8% | 10.4% | 0.4% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 10.7% | 13.0% | 2.3% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 6.3% | 22.0% | 15.7% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 12.6% | 28.6% | 16.1% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 30.0% | 27.4% | 2.6% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 20-24 with tertiary, Latvia or Philippines?
- Latvia, at 30.0% against 27.4% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 20-24 with tertiary between Latvia and Philippines?
- 2.6%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 20-24 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 11th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 20-24 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.