China vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with tertiary
China
2.7%
in 2010
Latvia
3.1%
in 2010
China rank
35th
Latvia rank
33rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with tertiary over time
- China
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 3.1% against 2.7% in China, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times China's.
The two have swapped places 5 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was China ahead.
China ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, China averaged higher in 3 and Latvia in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | China | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | China |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.2% | China |
| 1980s | 0.6% | 0.7% | 0.1% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 1.3% | 1.8% | 0.5% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 3.3% | 0.0% | 3.3% | China |
| 2010s | 2.7% | 3.1% | 0.4% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with tertiary, China or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 3.1% against 2.7% in China as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with tertiary between China and Latvia?
- 0.4%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for China and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do China and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with tertiary?
- China ranks 35th and Latvia ranks 33rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.