Latvia vs Netherlands: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary
Latvia
58.5%
in 2010
Netherlands
59.6%
in 2010
Latvia rank
36th
Netherlands rank
34th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Netherlands currently reports 59.6% against 58.5% in Latvia, a difference of 1.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Netherlands ahead.
Latvia ranks 36th and Netherlands ranks 34th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Netherlands in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.4% | 27.3% | 18.9% | Netherlands |
| 1970s | 13.4% | 73.1% | 59.7% | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 19.3% | 57.2% | 37.9% | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 32.3% | 46.2% | 13.9% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 61.3% | 54.2% | 7.1% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 58.5% | 59.6% | 1.1% | Netherlands |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary, Latvia or Netherlands?
- Netherlands, at 59.6% against 58.5% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 1.1%, with Netherlands ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 36th and Netherlands ranks 34th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.