Cuba vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary
Cuba
50.9%
in 2010
Philippines
50.5%
in 2010
Cuba rank
55th
Philippines rank
56th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary over time
- Cuba
- Philippines
How they compare
Cuba currently reports 50.9% against 50.5% in Philippines, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Cuba ranks 55th and Philippines ranks 56th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Cuba averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cuba | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 14.6% | 16.1% | 1.5% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 30.8% | 24.6% | 6.2% | Cuba |
| 1980s | 64.9% | 36.1% | 28.8% | Cuba |
| 1990s | 66.5% | 39.4% | 27.0% | Cuba |
| 2000s | 63.9% | 42.8% | 21.0% | Cuba |
| 2010s | 50.9% | 50.5% | 0.4% | Cuba |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary, Cuba or Philippines?
- Cuba, at 50.9% against 50.5% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary between Cuba and Philippines?
- 0.4%, with Cuba ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cuba and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Cuba and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary?
- Cuba ranks 55th and Philippines ranks 56th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of population age 15-19 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.