Latvia vs Netherlands: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary
Latvia
5.4%
in 2010
Netherlands
5.2%
in 2010
Latvia rank
22nd
Netherlands rank
24th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 5.4% against 5.2% in Netherlands, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 24th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.8% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 1.4% | 2.0% | 0.6% | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 1.3% | 2.5% | 1.2% | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 2.3% | 3.1% | 0.8% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 4.6% | 4.1% | 0.4% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.4% | 5.2% | 0.2% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary, Latvia or Netherlands?
- Latvia, at 5.4% against 5.2% in Netherlands as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 0.2%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 22nd and Netherlands ranks 24th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.