Latvia vs Lithuania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary
Latvia
5.4%
in 2010
Lithuania
5.6%
in 2010
Latvia rank
22nd
Lithuania rank
20th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 5.6% against 5.4% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 22nd and Lithuania ranks 20th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Lithuania in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.8% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 1.4% | 0.6% | 0.8% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 1.3% | 0.6% | 0.7% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 2.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 4.6% | 3.8% | 0.8% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 5.4% | 5.6% | 0.2% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary, Latvia or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 5.6% against 5.4% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary between Latvia and Lithuania?
- 0.2%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Lithuania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 22nd and Lithuania ranks 20th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.