Iceland vs Libya: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary
Iceland
2.8%
in 2010
Libya
2.4%
in 2010
Iceland rank
45th
Libya rank
48th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Iceland
- Libya
How they compare
Iceland currently reports 2.8% against 2.4% in Libya, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Libya's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, Iceland has been ahead every year.
Iceland ranks 45th and Libya ranks 48th of 144 countries.
Iceland has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Iceland | Libya | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.1% | 0.0% | 0.1% | Iceland |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 0.0% | 0.3% | Iceland |
| 1980s | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.6% | Iceland |
| 1990s | 1.3% | 0.2% | 1.1% | Iceland |
| 2000s | 2.0% | 0.8% | 1.1% | Iceland |
| 2010s | 2.8% | 2.4% | 0.4% | Iceland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary, Iceland or Libya?
- Iceland, at 2.8% against 2.4% in Libya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary between Iceland and Libya?
- 0.4%, with Iceland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Iceland and Libya?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Iceland and Libya rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Iceland ranks 45th and Libya ranks 48th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.