Finland vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary
Finland
8.5%
in 2010
Philippines
7.3%
in 2010
Finland rank
11th
Philippines rank
13th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Finland currently reports 8.5% against 7.3% in Philippines, a difference of 1.2%.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.2 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Finland ranks 11th and Philippines ranks 13th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.2% | 1.3% | 0.2% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 2.3% | 1.5% | 0.9% | Finland |
| 1980s | 2.9% | 3.9% | 1.0% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 4.0% | 9.8% | 5.7% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 5.5% | 12.1% | 6.6% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 8.5% | 7.3% | 1.2% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary, Finland or Philippines?
- Finland, at 8.5% against 7.3% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary between Finland and Philippines?
- 1.2%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Finland ranks 11th and Philippines ranks 13th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.