Australia vs Estonia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary
Australia
13.2%
in 2010
Estonia
10.4%
in 2010
Australia rank
5th
Estonia rank
8th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Estonia
How they compare
Australia currently reports 13.2% against 10.4% in Estonia, a difference of 2.8%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.3 times Estonia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 8th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Estonia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Estonia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.6% | 1.1% | 1.4% | Australia |
| 1970s | 3.7% | 1.1% | 2.6% | Australia |
| 1980s | 5.0% | 1.0% | 4.1% | Australia |
| 1990s | 4.7% | 2.7% | 2.0% | Australia |
| 2000s | 6.9% | 8.0% | 1.0% | Estonia |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 10.4% | 2.9% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary, Australia or Estonia?
- Australia, at 13.2% against 10.4% in Estonia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary between Australia and Estonia?
- 2.8%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Estonia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Estonia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 5th and Estonia ranks 8th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.