Australia vs Canada: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary
Australia
13.2%
in 2010
Canada
17.1%
in 2010
Australia rank
5th
Canada rank
3rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Canada
How they compare
Canada currently reports 17.1% against 13.2% in Australia, a difference of 3.9%.
That makes Canada's figure about 1.3 times Australia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Canada ahead.
Australia ranks 5th and Canada ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Canada in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Canada | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.6% | 5.1% | 2.6% | Canada |
| 1970s | 3.7% | 3.6% | 0.1% | Australia |
| 1980s | 5.0% | 4.6% | 0.4% | Australia |
| 1990s | 4.7% | 5.6% | 0.9% | Canada |
| 2000s | 6.9% | 9.7% | 2.8% | Canada |
| 2010s | 13.2% | 17.1% | 3.9% | Canada |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary, Australia or Canada?
- Canada, at 17.1% against 13.2% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary between Australia and Canada?
- 3.9%, with Canada ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Canada?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Canada rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 5th and Canada ranks 3rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.