Panama vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary
Panama
8.9%
in 2010
Philippines
9.3%
in 2010
Panama rank
64th
Philippines rank
63rd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary over time
- Panama
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 9.3% against 8.9% in Panama, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 64th and Philippines ranks 63rd of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.1% | 3.1% | 2.0% | Panama |
| 1970s | 5.6% | 2.9% | 2.8% | Panama |
| 1980s | 5.8% | 6.2% | 0.4% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 7.0% | 10.7% | 3.7% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 8.2% | 10.5% | 2.2% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 8.9% | 9.3% | 0.3% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary, Panama or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 9.3% against 8.9% in Panama as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary between Panama and Philippines?
- 0.4%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Panama and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary?
- Panama ranks 64th and Philippines ranks 63rd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.