Latvia vs Tonga: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary
Latvia
39.3%
in 2010
Tonga
43.4%
in 2010
Latvia rank
8th
Tonga rank
5th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Tonga
How they compare
Tonga currently reports 43.4% against 39.3% in Latvia, a difference of 4.1%.
That makes Tonga's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Tonga ahead.
Latvia ranks 8th and Tonga ranks 5th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 1 and Tonga in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Tonga | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 6.6% | 22.8% | 16.2% | Tonga |
| 1970s | 8.2% | 32.1% | 23.9% | Tonga |
| 1980s | 9.5% | 35.6% | 26.1% | Tonga |
| 1990s | 17.6% | 34.6% | 17.0% | Tonga |
| 2000s | 37.5% | 32.9% | 4.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 39.3% | 43.4% | 4.1% | Tonga |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary, Latvia or Tonga?
- Tonga, at 43.4% against 39.3% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary between Latvia and Tonga?
- 4.1%, with Tonga ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Tonga?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Tonga rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 8th and Tonga ranks 5th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.