Australia vs Rwanda: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with primary
Australia
8.2%
in 2010
Rwanda
8.2%
in 2010
Australia rank
82nd
Rwanda rank
81st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with primary over time
- Australia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 8.2% against 8.2% in Australia, a difference of 0.0%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 81st of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 24.9% | 1.3% | 23.6% | Australia |
| 1970s | 16.9% | 1.9% | 15.0% | Australia |
| 1980s | 4.2% | 1.4% | 2.8% | Australia |
| 1990s | 6.5% | 1.8% | 4.7% | Australia |
| 2000s | 10.3% | 5.5% | 4.8% | Australia |
| 2010s | 8.2% | 8.2% | 0.0% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with primary, Australia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 8.2% against 8.2% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with primary between Australia and Rwanda?
- 0.0%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Rwanda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Rwanda rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 65-69 with primary?
- Australia ranks 82nd and Rwanda ranks 81st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 65-69 with primary schooling. Incompleted Primary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.