Finland vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary
Finland
12.7%
in 2010
Philippines
12.2%
in 2010
Finland rank
9th
Philippines rank
10th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Finland currently reports 12.7% against 12.2% in Philippines, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Finland ranks 9th and Philippines ranks 10th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 2 and Philippines in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.4% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 2.9% | 1.8% | 1.1% | Finland |
| 1980s | 3.3% | 4.0% | 0.7% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 4.9% | 9.9% | 5.0% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 9.2% | 12.2% | 3.0% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 12.2% | 0.4% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary, Finland or Philippines?
- Finland, at 12.7% against 12.2% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary between Finland and Philippines?
- 0.5%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Finland ranks 9th and Philippines ranks 10th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.