Finland vs New Zealand: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary
Finland
12.7%
in 2010
New Zealand
14.5%
in 2010
Finland rank
9th
New Zealand rank
6th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
New Zealand currently reports 14.5% against 12.7% in Finland, a difference of 1.8%.
That makes New Zealand's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
Across all 11 years both countries report, New Zealand has been ahead every year.
Finland ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 144 countries.
New Zealand has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 1.2% | 0.3% | New Zealand |
| 1970s | 2.9% | 4.5% | 1.6% | New Zealand |
| 1980s | 3.3% | 6.1% | 2.8% | New Zealand |
| 1990s | 4.9% | 9.8% | 4.9% | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 9.2% | 12.1% | 2.9% | New Zealand |
| 2010s | 12.7% | 14.5% | 1.9% | New Zealand |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary, Finland or New Zealand?
- New Zealand, at 14.5% against 12.7% in Finland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary between Finland and New Zealand?
- 1.8%, with New Zealand ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Finland ranks 9th and New Zealand ranks 6th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.