Estonia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary
Estonia
13.8%
in 2010
Philippines
12.2%
in 2010
Estonia rank
8th
Philippines rank
10th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Estonia
- Philippines
How they compare
Estonia currently reports 13.8% against 12.2% in Philippines, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Estonia's figure about 1.1 times Philippines's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Philippines ahead.
Estonia ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 10th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Estonia averaged higher in 1 and Philippines in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Estonia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 1.3% | 0.3% | Philippines |
| 1970s | 1.0% | 1.8% | 0.8% | Philippines |
| 1980s | 1.0% | 4.0% | 2.9% | Philippines |
| 1990s | 3.9% | 9.9% | 6.0% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 10.1% | 12.2% | 2.2% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 13.8% | 12.2% | 1.6% | Estonia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary, Estonia or Philippines?
- Estonia, at 13.8% against 12.2% in Philippines as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary between Estonia and Philippines?
- 1.6%, with Estonia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Estonia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Estonia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Estonia ranks 8th and Philippines ranks 10th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.