Australia vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary
Australia
11.7%
in 2010
Philippines
12.2%
in 2010
Australia rank
12th
Philippines rank
10th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 12.2% against 11.7% in Australia, a difference of 0.5%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 10th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.7% | 1.3% | 1.4% | Australia |
| 1970s | 3.9% | 1.8% | 2.1% | Australia |
| 1980s | 4.6% | 4.0% | 0.7% | Australia |
| 1990s | 5.1% | 9.9% | 4.8% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 7.7% | 12.2% | 4.5% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 11.7% | 12.2% | 0.6% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary, Australia or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 12.2% against 11.7% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary between Australia and Philippines?
- 0.5%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 12th and Philippines ranks 10th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.