Australia vs Belgium: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary
Australia
11.7%
in 2010
Belgium
10.1%
in 2010
Australia rank
12th
Belgium rank
15th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary over time
- Australia
- Belgium
How they compare
Australia currently reports 11.7% against 10.1% in Belgium, a difference of 1.6%.
That makes Australia's figure about 1.2 times Belgium's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 12th and Belgium ranks 15th of 144 countries.
Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Belgium | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 2.7% | 0.5% | 2.2% | Australia |
| 1970s | 3.9% | 0.6% | 3.3% | Australia |
| 1980s | 4.6% | 1.1% | 3.6% | Australia |
| 1990s | 5.1% | 2.8% | 2.3% | Australia |
| 2000s | 7.7% | 7.6% | 0.1% | Australia |
| 2010s | 11.7% | 10.1% | 1.6% | Australia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary, Australia or Belgium?
- Australia, at 11.7% against 10.1% in Belgium as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary between Australia and Belgium?
- 1.6%, with Australia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary?
- Australia ranks 12th and Belgium ranks 15th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.