Panama vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary
Panama
11.2%
in 2010
Philippines
11.3%
in 2010
Panama rank
62nd
Philippines rank
61st
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Panama
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 11.3% against 11.2% in Panama, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Panama ahead.
Panama ranks 62nd and Philippines ranks 61st of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Panama averaged higher in 3 and Philippines in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Panama | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 5.6% | 3.1% | 2.5% | Panama |
| 1970s | 6.8% | 3.5% | 3.3% | Panama |
| 1980s | 7.3% | 6.4% | 0.9% | Panama |
| 1990s | 8.5% | 11.1% | 2.7% | Philippines |
| 2000s | 9.8% | 10.6% | 0.8% | Philippines |
| 2010s | 11.2% | 11.3% | 0.1% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary, Panama or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 11.3% against 11.2% in Panama as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary between Panama and Philippines?
- 0.1%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Panama and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Panama and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Panama ranks 62nd and Philippines ranks 61st of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.