Libya vs Rwanda: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary
Libya
0.9%
in 2010
Rwanda
1.2%
in 2010
Libya rank
130th
Rwanda rank
128th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Libya
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.2% against 0.9% in Libya, a difference of 0.3%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.4 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Rwanda ahead.
Libya ranks 130th and Rwanda ranks 128th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Libya averaged higher in 3 and Rwanda in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 0.2% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
| 1970s | 0.0% | 0.4% | 0.3% | Rwanda |
| 1980s | 0.1% | 0.1% | 0.0% | Libya |
| 1990s | 0.3% | 0.1% | 0.2% | Libya |
| 2000s | 0.7% | 0.1% | 0.6% | Libya |
| 2010s | 0.9% | 1.2% | 0.3% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary, Libya or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1.2% against 0.9% in Libya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary between Libya and Rwanda?
- 0.3%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Rwanda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Rwanda rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 130th and Rwanda ranks 128th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.