Latvia vs Romania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary
Latvia
36.9%
in 2010
Romania
40.5%
in 2010
Latvia rank
7th
Romania rank
6th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Romania
How they compare
Romania currently reports 40.5% against 36.9% in Latvia, a difference of 3.6%.
That makes Romania's figure about 1.1 times Latvia's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 7th and Romania ranks 6th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Romania in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Romania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.9% | 3.4% | 5.5% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 9.4% | 7.9% | 1.5% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 10.0% | 14.1% | 4.2% | Romania |
| 1990s | 20.2% | 28.2% | 8.0% | Romania |
| 2000s | 38.9% | 33.3% | 5.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 36.9% | 40.5% | 3.6% | Romania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary, Latvia or Romania?
- Romania, at 40.5% against 36.9% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary between Latvia and Romania?
- 3.6%, with Romania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Romania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Romania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 7th and Romania ranks 6th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.