Latvia vs Netherlands: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary
Latvia
36.9%
in 2010
Netherlands
32.1%
in 2010
Latvia rank
7th
Netherlands rank
9th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Latvia
- Netherlands
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 36.9% against 32.1% in Netherlands, a difference of 4.8%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Netherlands's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 7th and Netherlands ranks 9th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 3 and Netherlands in 3.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Netherlands | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 8.9% | 5.4% | 3.5% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 9.4% | 17.7% | 8.4% | Netherlands |
| 1980s | 10.0% | 25.9% | 16.0% | Netherlands |
| 1990s | 20.2% | 32.5% | 12.3% | Netherlands |
| 2000s | 38.9% | 35.3% | 3.6% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 36.9% | 32.1% | 4.7% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary, Latvia or Netherlands?
- Latvia, at 36.9% against 32.1% in Netherlands as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary between Latvia and Netherlands?
- 4.8%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Netherlands?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Netherlands rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Latvia ranks 7th and Netherlands ranks 9th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.