Congo vs Peru: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary
Congo
4.3%
in 2010
Peru
4.8%
in 2010
Congo rank
101st
Peru rank
100th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Congo
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.8% against 4.3% in Congo, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Peru ahead.
Congo ranks 101st and Peru ranks 100th of 144 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2% | 1.8% | 1.7% | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.3% | 2.9% | 2.6% | Peru |
| 1980s | 0.4% | 4.0% | 3.6% | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.4% | 1.2% | 0.8% | Peru |
| 2000s | 2.4% | 3.5% | 1.0% | Peru |
| 2010s | 4.3% | 4.8% | 0.5% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary, Congo or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.8% against 4.3% in Congo as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary between Congo and Peru?
- 0.5%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Congo and Peru rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Congo ranks 101st and Peru ranks 100th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.