Australia vs Finland: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary
Australia
30.9%
in 2010
Finland
31.7%
in 2010
Australia rank
13th
Finland rank
10th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary over time
- Australia
- Finland
How they compare
Finland currently reports 31.7% against 30.9% in Australia, a difference of 0.8%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Australia ahead.
Australia ranks 13th and Finland ranks 10th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 4 and Finland in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Australia | Finland | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 22.5% | 5.5% | 16.9% | Australia |
| 1970s | 32.2% | 14.1% | 18.0% | Australia |
| 1980s | 37.0% | 7.0% | 30.1% | Australia |
| 1990s | 26.2% | 11.1% | 15.2% | Australia |
| 2000s | 15.7% | 19.6% | 3.9% | Finland |
| 2010s | 30.9% | 31.7% | 0.8% | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary, Australia or Finland?
- Finland, at 31.7% against 30.9% in Australia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary between Australia and Finland?
- 0.8%, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Finland?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Australia and Finland rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary?
- Australia ranks 13th and Finland ranks 10th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 60-64 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.