Libya vs Peru: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 55-59 with secondary
Libya
3.8%
in 2010
Peru
4.8%
in 2010
Libya rank
107th
Peru rank
104th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 55-59 with secondary over time
- Libya
- Peru
How they compare
Peru currently reports 4.8% against 3.8% in Libya, a difference of 1.0%.
That makes Peru's figure about 1.3 times Libya's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Peru ahead.
Libya ranks 107th and Peru ranks 104th of 144 countries.
Peru has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Libya | Peru | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.0% | 2.3% | 2.3% | Peru |
| 1970s | 0.1% | 3.5% | 3.4% | Peru |
| 1980s | 0.2% | 4.4% | 4.3% | Peru |
| 1990s | 0.4% | 1.4% | 1.0% | Peru |
| 2000s | 0.9% | 4.4% | 3.5% | Peru |
| 2010s | 3.8% | 4.8% | 1.0% | Peru |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 55-59 with secondary, Libya or Peru?
- Peru, at 4.8% against 3.8% in Libya as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 55-59 with secondary between Libya and Peru?
- 1.0%, with Peru ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Libya and Peru?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Libya and Peru rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 55-59 with secondary?
- Libya ranks 107th and Peru ranks 104th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 55-59 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.