Chile vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 50-54 with secondary
Chile
27.5%
in 2010
Latvia
33.0%
in 2010
Chile rank
14th
Latvia rank
11th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 50-54 with secondary over time
- Chile
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 33.0% against 27.5% in Chile, a difference of 5.5%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.2 times Chile's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 14th and Latvia ranks 11th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Latvia in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.3% | 9.1% | 2.2% | Chile |
| 1970s | 10.4% | 10.4% | 0.0% | Chile |
| 1980s | 8.9% | 16.6% | 7.7% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 9.8% | 27.3% | 17.5% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 14.3% | 36.8% | 22.5% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 27.5% | 33.0% | 5.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 50-54 with secondary, Chile or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 33.0% against 27.5% in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 50-54 with secondary between Chile and Latvia?
- 5.5%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 50-54 with secondary?
- Chile ranks 14th and Latvia ranks 11th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 50-54 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.