Latvia vs Luxembourg: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary
Latvia
7.5%
in 2010
Luxembourg
7.7%
in 2010
Latvia rank
40th
Luxembourg rank
37th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary over time
- Latvia
- Luxembourg
How they compare
Luxembourg currently reports 7.7% against 7.5% in Latvia, a difference of 0.2%.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Latvia ranks 40th and Luxembourg ranks 37th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Latvia averaged higher in 5 and Luxembourg in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Luxembourg | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.4% | 0.8% | 0.6% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 2.5% | 1.1% | 1.4% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 4.1% | 2.5% | 1.6% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 5.4% | 4.2% | 1.2% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 7.4% | 6.2% | 1.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 7.5% | 7.7% | 0.3% | Luxembourg |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary, Latvia or Luxembourg?
- Luxembourg, at 7.7% against 7.5% in Latvia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary between Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 0.2%, with Luxembourg ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Luxembourg?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Latvia and Luxembourg rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary?
- Latvia ranks 40th and Luxembourg ranks 37th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.