Chile vs Lithuania: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary
Chile
10.8%
in 2010
Lithuania
11.2%
in 2010
Chile rank
21st
Lithuania rank
20th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary over time
- Chile
- Lithuania
How they compare
Lithuania currently reports 11.2% against 10.8% in Chile, a difference of 0.4%.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 21st and Lithuania ranks 20th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Chile averaged higher in 2 and Lithuania in 4.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Lithuania | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.9% | 0.6% | 0.3% | Chile |
| 1970s | 1.2% | 1.6% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 2.5% | 3.3% | 0.8% | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 4.4% | 5.2% | 0.8% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 11.1% | 8.5% | 2.5% | Chile |
| 2010s | 10.8% | 11.2% | 0.4% | Lithuania |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary, Chile or Lithuania?
- Lithuania, at 11.2% against 10.8% in Chile as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary between Chile and Lithuania?
- 0.4%, with Lithuania ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Lithuania?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Lithuania rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary?
- Chile ranks 21st and Lithuania ranks 20th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.