Mauritius vs Namibia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary
Mauritius
11.2%
in 2010
Namibia
11.3%
in 2010
Mauritius rank
77th
Namibia rank
76th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Mauritius
- Namibia
How they compare
Namibia currently reports 11.3% against 11.2% in Mauritius, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Namibia ahead.
Mauritius ranks 77th and Namibia ranks 76th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Mauritius averaged higher in 1 and Namibia in 5.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Mauritius | Namibia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 1.0% | 6.3% | 5.2% | Namibia |
| 1970s | 1.4% | 5.5% | 4.2% | Namibia |
| 1980s | 4.6% | 6.5% | 1.9% | Namibia |
| 1990s | 6.1% | 7.9% | 1.8% | Namibia |
| 2000s | 13.3% | 8.2% | 5.1% | Mauritius |
| 2010s | 11.2% | 11.3% | 0.1% | Namibia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary, Mauritius or Namibia?
- Namibia, at 11.3% against 11.2% in Mauritius as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary between Mauritius and Namibia?
- 0.1%, with Namibia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Mauritius and Namibia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Mauritius and Namibia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Mauritius ranks 77th and Namibia ranks 76th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.