Lithuania vs Rwanda: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary
Lithuania
2.0%
in 2010
Rwanda
2.1%
in 2010
Lithuania rank
137th
Rwanda rank
136th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Lithuania
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 2.1% against 2.0% in Lithuania, a difference of 0.1%.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.1 times Lithuania's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Lithuania ahead.
Lithuania ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 136th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Lithuania averaged higher in 5 and Rwanda in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lithuania | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 3.7% | 0.2% | 3.5% | Lithuania |
| 1970s | 9.3% | 0.1% | 9.2% | Lithuania |
| 1980s | 20.4% | 0.1% | 20.3% | Lithuania |
| 1990s | 14.0% | 0.7% | 13.3% | Lithuania |
| 2000s | 3.9% | 1.8% | 2.1% | Lithuania |
| 2010s | 2.0% | 2.1% | 0.2% | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary, Lithuania or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 2.1% against 2.0% in Lithuania as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary between Lithuania and Rwanda?
- 0.1%, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lithuania and Rwanda?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Lithuania and Rwanda rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Lithuania ranks 137th and Rwanda ranks 136th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.