Finland vs Philippines: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary
Finland
14.4%
in 2010
Philippines
16.1%
in 2010
Finland rank
52nd
Philippines rank
49th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Finland
- Philippines
How they compare
Philippines currently reports 16.1% against 14.4% in Finland, a difference of 1.7%.
That makes Philippines's figure about 1.1 times Finland's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 49th of 144 countries.
Across the 6 decades both report, Finland averaged higher in 5 and Philippines in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | Philippines | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 9.6% | 3.2% | 6.4% | Finland |
| 1970s | 14.8% | 4.0% | 10.8% | Finland |
| 1980s | 12.7% | 7.0% | 5.6% | Finland |
| 1990s | 18.7% | 11.5% | 7.2% | Finland |
| 2000s | 13.1% | 12.1% | 1.0% | Finland |
| 2010s | 14.4% | 16.1% | 1.7% | Philippines |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary, Finland or Philippines?
- Philippines, at 16.1% against 14.4% in Finland as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary between Finland and Philippines?
- 1.7%, with Philippines ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and Philippines?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Finland and Philippines rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Finland ranks 52nd and Philippines ranks 49th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.