Chile vs Zimbabwe: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary
Chile
27.5%
in 2010
Zimbabwe
24.8%
in 2010
Chile rank
20th
Zimbabwe rank
22nd
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary over time
- Chile
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Chile currently reports 27.5% against 24.8% in Zimbabwe, a difference of 2.7%.
That makes Chile's figure about 1.1 times Zimbabwe's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Chile ahead.
Chile ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 144 countries.
Chile has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Chile | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 11.3% | 0.8% | 10.5% | Chile |
| 1970s | 11.9% | 0.8% | 11.0% | Chile |
| 1980s | 10.0% | 1.5% | 8.4% | Chile |
| 1990s | 11.2% | 4.7% | 6.5% | Chile |
| 2000s | 17.4% | 17.0% | 0.3% | Chile |
| 2010s | 27.5% | 24.8% | 2.7% | Chile |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary, Chile or Zimbabwe?
- Chile, at 27.5% against 24.8% in Zimbabwe as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary between Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 2.7%, with Chile ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Chile and Zimbabwe?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Chile and Zimbabwe rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary?
- Chile ranks 20th and Zimbabwe ranks 22nd of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 45-49 with secondary schooling. Incompleted Secondary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.