Ecuador vs Latvia: Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with tertiary
Ecuador
6.1%
in 2010
Latvia
6.6%
in 2010
Ecuador rank
51st
Latvia rank
48th
Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with tertiary over time
- Ecuador
- Latvia
How they compare
Latvia currently reports 6.6% against 6.1% in Ecuador, a difference of 0.5%.
That makes Latvia's figure about 1.1 times Ecuador's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 11 shared years of data; in 1960 it was Latvia ahead.
Ecuador ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 48th of 144 countries.
Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 6 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ecuador | Latvia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1960s | 0.2% | 1.4% | 1.2% | Latvia |
| 1970s | 0.5% | 3.4% | 2.8% | Latvia |
| 1980s | 1.5% | 4.7% | 3.2% | Latvia |
| 1990s | 4.1% | 6.0% | 1.9% | Latvia |
| 2000s | 6.8% | 7.0% | 0.2% | Latvia |
| 2010s | 6.1% | 6.6% | 0.5% | Latvia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with tertiary, Ecuador or Latvia?
- Latvia, at 6.6% against 6.1% in Ecuador as of 2010.
- What is the difference in barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with tertiary between Ecuador and Latvia?
- 0.5%, with Latvia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ecuador and Latvia?
- 11 years are reported by both, from 1960 to 2010.
- How do Ecuador and Latvia rank globally for barro-lee: percentage of female population age 40-44 with tertiary?
- Ecuador ranks 51st and Latvia ranks 48th of 144 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- The World Bank, published as Barro-Lee: Percentage of female population age 40-44 with tertiary schooling. Incompleted Tertiary. Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.